Twenty LinkedIn articles, live and title-matched

We write the LinkedIn content for a social media security company: venture-backed, protecting household-name brands, sold as a managed subscription. Twenty of our pieces are live on the company’s LinkedIn page, titles matching what we delivered.

Measured externally: Ahrefs via third-party gateway + public LinkedIn verification. No client analytics.

The result

The result: the company’s own LinkedIn became a publishing channel

Site signal	May 2026	Sep 2026	Change
Domain Rating (DR)	60	62	+2
Referring domains	728	1161	+433
Ranked keywords, top-10 (Ahrefs sample)	904	651	-253
Indexed pages (Ahrefs)	132	83	-49

What these numbers mean: Domain Rating (DR) is Ahrefs’ third-party score of a website’s authority on a 0-100 scale. Ahrefs is an independent SEO data provider, not Google and not the client. All figures below are its estimates. DR rose (+2) despite a large share of low-quality link networks among the +433 referring domains. Ranked-keyword and indexed-page counts fell substantially; no keyword-growth claim is made. These are site-level signals, and our work is LinkedIn-native, so it does not move the company’s search rankings directly.

What we did

LinkedIn articles and posts, verified live

17 Pulse articles and 3 feed posts on the company’s LinkedIn page, every URL verified live (HTTP 200), titles matching our source files
Topics: account-takeover protection, impersonator takedown, phishing, and brand security: the exact risk categories buyers research before purchasing
The first four pieces verified with publish dates (May 2026); the rest confirmed by live-URL check
LinkedIn reach and engagement are not fully public, so we assert only what we can verify: the live URLs and matching titles

What we did not claim

The client’s blog (which does rank on Google) is not our work. We did not write it, and we say so plainly.
Because the content is LinkedIn-native, Google search ranking does not apply to it.
Engagement counts are not measurable from outside LinkedIn.

The client

Anonymized, by industry and stage

The story is the shape of the deal, not the brand.

Attribute	Profile
Industry	Social media security: account-takeover protection, impersonator removal, and phishing/bot defense for marketing and social teams
Stage	Seed ($7M, January 2025). Round covered by SecurityWeek, VentureBeat, and Crunchbase
Backers	Lead investor is a specialist AI fund; round also includes an existing seed-stage venture firm, the corporate venture arm of a major website-builder platform, and two specialist funds. Sources: SecurityWeek, VentureBeat, Crunchbase
Team	About 24 employees (Tracxn record, March 2026). Co-founded by three operators with product, engineering, and security backgrounds (names redacted). HQ: Hoboken, New Jersey (Crunchbase)
Status	Private; the /about page self-publishes named testimonials from a Sharp Global social-media manager, a FingerMonkeys CEO, a Powtoon VP, a Dominion Diagnostics director, and a named founder/influencer. Self-reports G2 rating of 4.7/5
Proof	A full public customer-logo roster is not published. The “Trusted by the world’s leading marketing teams” framing is the company’s own self-description on /about

What the pricing tells you about the deal

No public price: demo-gated; priced per account and per platform; not a one-off fee
Per-account or per-platform rates and ACV figures are not publicly disclosed and are not in our evidence base
Twenty live pieces on the company’s own LinkedIn plus 46 AI Overview citations keep the brand visible exactly where security and marketing buyers are looking

AI visibility

The visibility signal for a LinkedIn-native engagement

Signal	Count
Google AI Overview citations	46 (across 16 pages)
Assistant-engine citations (ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, Perplexity)	18
Direct buyer-question probe	Client domain not yet cited in AI answer text (honest baseline)

Domain-level AI citations reflecting the site and its published content estate. We re-run the same measurement monthly and compare. Source: Ahrefs, 21 September 2026.

How this was measured

The honest version

Where the data comes from: Ahrefs, an independent third-party SEO data provider. Its figures are estimates, not Google’s own data and not the client’s.
Rank positions: live captures of the Google search results on a single date (21 September 2026), not a tracked history.
No client analytics: we did not use the client’s sessions, conversions, or revenue numbers. Those are client-side and we will not present them as ours.
Declines are reported as declines: where a number fell in the window, it is shown as measured, not smoothed over.
Scope is explicit: our work for this client is the LinkedIn content only. Any ranking pages on the client’s blog are their own and are not claimed.

Want this for your business?

Authority and AI visibility for companies that sell to big buyers. A 30-minute call to show the method on your market.

Book a free 30-minute diagnostic